Electric Cars Claimed To Be Environmental Threats


According to a recent report, electric cars may produce much more pollution compared to conventional internal combustion vehicles. The said study was undertaken by the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, which found greenhouse gas emissions had increased dramatically because of the use of coal as fuel to produce electricity.

It also said that electric car factories emitted more toxic waste compared to conventional car factories in the report published in the Journal of Industrial Ecology. On the other hand, the study also found that electric cars still made the sense.

The study focused on the life cycle impact of conventional and electric vehicles. The researchers considered how the production, the use and the end of life dismantling that affects the environment, as explained by study co-author Professor Anders Hammer Stromman.

He said, “The production phase of electric vehicles proved substantially more environmentally intensive. The global warming potential from electric vehicle production is about twice that of conventional vehicles.” The study compared how conventional cars are made, as well as the production of batteries and electric motors that require a lot of toxic minerals like nickel, copper and aluminium.

Professor Stromman added, “Across the other impacts considered in the analysis including potential for effects related to acid rain, airborne particulate matter, smog, human toxicity, ecosystem toxicity and depletion of fossil fuel and mineral resources, electric vehicles consistently perform worse or on par with modern internal combustion engine vehicles, despite virtually zero direct emissions during operation.”

One recommendation would be to use electricity generated by low carbon sources which can then reach “the potential for substantial reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and exposusre to tailpipe emissions”. This though, may not be achievable especially in regions where fossil fuels are the main generators of power and electricity, as this would result in more harm than beneficial effects.

The report stated, “It is counterproductive to promote electric vehicles in regions where electricity is primarily produced from lignite, coal or even heavy oil combustion.”

One such region that would benefit would be Europe, where electricity is created in a different number of platforms. Electric cars would offer the benefits to the environment compared to what internal combustion engines would do. The report said, “Electric vehicles powered by the present European electricity mix offer a 10% to 24% decrease in their global warming potential relative to conventional diesel or petrol vehicles.”

The report said that longer the period an electric car remains mobile in Europe, the greater its beneficial effect over conventional cars. The report found, “Assuming a vehicle lifetime of 200,000 km exaggerates the global warming benefits of electric vehicles to 27 to 29% relative to petrol and 17 to 20% relative to diesel. An assumption of 100,000 km decreases the benefit of electric vehicles to 9 to 14% with respect to petrol vehicles and results in impacts indistinguishable from those of a diesel vehicle.”

The life of an electric car depends greatly on its battery life and this is the major expense in maintaining these vehicles. The technology though is getting better and this can result in electric cars having a longer service life. Even as the technology for conventional cars improve, these though do not remain constant as the report found, “A more significant reduction in global warming could potentially be achieved by increasing fuel efficiency or shifting from petrol to diesel. If you are considering purchasing an electric vehicle for its environmental benefits, first check your electricity source and second look closely at the warranty on the batteries.”

Rare Earth Materials from Refined Nuclear Waste Proposed


One of the long term concerns regarding the increased production of electric vehicles is the supply of rare earth metals. These metals are used for magnets for electric vehicles, rechargeable batteries and display screens. Most of the material can be found only in China and their increased demand may lead to increased prices.

A proposed legislative solution has been made by Reps Mike Coffman and Doug Lamborn to remove the Chinese monopoly on rare earth metals. Most mines in the United States closed down due to lack of demand as the Chinese mining industry undercut global prices to corner the supply and demand.

Both Republican Congressmen co-authored the National Strategic and Critical Minerals Policy Act of 2011. The bill aims to deregulate the American rare earth industry through review, modification and removal of U.S. laws deemed detrimental to the US industry.

With the proposed legislation, a key area of vulnerability in the U.S. defense capability is addressed as China continues to strong arm the market through embargoes as well as limiting supplies to drive up prices.

There are major issues though with the re-opening of rare earth mining facilities in the country. Aside from the environmental impact mining creates, the refinement of rare earth metals results in radioactive wastes that can result in environmental degradation. There have even been studies showing that birth defects, as well as leukemia rates, increase near and around rare earth refineries.

According to the U.S. Geological Survey, one of the largest rare earth deposits in the world can be found in Southern Colorado. While rare earth metals can be found abundantly in the Earth’s crust, only a few areas in the world have deposits that can be mined and used for current commercial needs.

As of the moment, the United States House Committee on Natural Resources unanimously approved the bill at the committee level and forwarded it for plenary discussion. What this means is that China would not continue to have a stranglehold over the rare earth metals market and soon a better system, as well as supply, would be made available for electric cars and other environmentally sound transport use and assembly.